Will you help us or not? Raising funds and rallying community for critical access hospitals – Part 2

March 8th, 2010

This is the second part of a tale (read Part 1 here) of how one doctor driven by passion, faith and belief in a greater common good inspired a small rural community to build a critical access hospital, as told by Michael Curtis, VP of Business Development.

Dr Haug tells me he’s going to a conference to find out more about the new HUD mortgage insurance programs for health care facilities and critical access hospitals. Rural hospitals have had it bad of late, going bankrupt. He tells me a man named Charles Erwin (now with Dougherty Mortgage) says he can access funding for the hospital. But first Dr Haug has to work with Stroudwater Consulting to build a business plan and show how he will repay the debt. So he does. An architect by the name of Mark Johnson draws up some plans. Dr Haug forms a relationship with The Neenan Company to design and construct a solution to replace his aged facility. We manage the project from plan to construction as I work to secure equity sources for Dr Haug’s dream.

A pledge of $350,000 is made by one community member. Dr Haug scrapes together $100,000 of working capital. The community brings $50-75,000. But the project will cost $11 million to build and to meet the loan requirements, the community must raise $1 million, 10% of the entire loan amount for it to go through. “How will they manage to pull this off?” I wonder. “Will you help us or not?” asks Dr Haug. I’m not sure if I can. I’m struggling to manage pieces that won’t come together. He looks at me and says, “I don’t think you see this quite right.”

But he does. In 2003, Dr Haug will find himself and his facility invited into the new HUD 242 program which provides mortgage insurance to critical access hospitals, allowing them to access bonds at a lower rate and reducing costs to Medicare which pays for the costs of running such hospitals. But not before encountering a significant obstacle. His health. Diagnosed with liver cancer, Dr Haug spends all his working capital in the years before 2003 engaging Stroudwater, Neenan and Mark Johnson to build the community’s hospital. It’s not a good diagnosis or prognosis and he travels alone to Denver regularly to have IV chemotherapy. It is during these sessions that we meet as I take over as development manager for the project. I suggest we talk either before or after his treatment but he insists on talking through it. He says it will distract him from the pain.

I run through the decisions that need to be made, cash that needs to be raised and all the minutiae associated with orchestrating his dream.  He decides we need to begin aggressively promoting the replacement facility. Inspired by his continued commitment to his dream, in spite of failing health, we manage to convince the board to write 5 checks worth $5000 each. A local bachelor in South Fork calls and wants to contribute a piece of real estate worth $600,000. He has no heirs and wants to contribute to a common good. This single act spurs multiple donations. Dr Haug continues his staggering work as the county coroner, president of the San Luis Valley HMO, and the hospital’s admitting physician while fighting cancer. I arrive one day to find him in a clinical consult with an elderly man and his family who want to know about his project so the gentleman can write a check.

The HUD loan is approved in June 2003 but the community remains tight for cash. Inspired by Dr Haug’s story, the county contributes a road crew and access to their borrow pit and equipment to build a road base and building pad for the hospital. A contribution worth $600,000. The dream begins to take material form.  In August 2004, Dr Haug enters a 35,000 square foot, 14 bed critical access hospital with surgery, imaging lab and reference library. Who would have guessed?

It was an impossible project. My peers thought I was crazy. We took on monumental challenges. But he made me believe. He made the professional team who worked with him believe. Most importantly, he made his community believe and in the light of such inspired commitment, they pulled together to accomplish the impossible. Liver cancer finally claimed Dr Haug’s life in May 2007 but his commitment to providing quality care to his community lives on.

“Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” Margaret Mead.

Kirsti

Bookmark and Share

Will you help us or not? Raising funds and rallying community for critical access hospitals – Part 1

March 4th, 2010

This is a tale of how one doctor driven by passion, faith and belief in a greater common good inspired a small rural community to build a critical access hospital. It is a tale of individual and communal dreams and health. A tale of relentless passion and unending obstacles. A tale of dreams and visions brought to life by staggering loss. An inspiring tale told by Michael Curtis, VP of Business Development.

I met Dr Norman Haug in 1998 when he asked me to spend a day with him. I drove 4 hours from Denver, Colorado only to arrive at the shocking sight of the facility at which he worked. Opened by the Sisters of St Joseph in 1907, the Rio Grande Hospital had gone out of business in 1993 and had been sold at auction to someone who wanted to operate a nursing home. The owners used 1/2 the building while the rest was left virtually abandoned. Three years later, two significant tragedies would befall the small community of Del Norte. A teenager in a rollover on Wolf Creek Pass dies of blood loss in the ‘golden hour’ after the accident. Then a few months later, a leader in the community suffers a heart attack, also losing his life in that precious hour due to a lack of access to care. Dr Haug is compelled to reopen the facility. The community raises funds to re-open the facility as a 501 3 (c) (non profit) run by the Valley Citizen’s Foundation for Healthcare, Inc. The largest contributors become board members with Norman Haug the hospital administrator. He asks the owner if they can lease some of the facility after it has been closed up for a number of years.

When I arrive, it is open. But barely. There is an administrator office and an admissions area where Dr Haug sits under an OR light and admits people. They’re making use of what they could. I wonder to myself, “how on earth can you run a hospital in this environment?” But Dr Haug had been a medic in the Vietnam War and had run a MASH unit through which close to 20,000 people had passed. He tells me he is used to operating in tents and had received government money to run the MASH unit which inspired him to replace the facility. The facility makes me nervous, but I meet with Dr Haug and watch as he continues to admit people, with a solitary open window to cool the room on a stifling hot day; all the others broken.

He wants to take me to see some sites. I climb into his sideswiped pickup with a banged up passenger door and as he takes one corner, the door opens and I almost fall out of the vehicle. This is not my lucky day. What am I doing here? Dr Haug reaches over and grabs me, hauling me into the cab as we shut the door hard and continue on our way. I continue to mull over an invisible project check list. They don’t have any money. I don’t think the hospital is viable. Site solutions are minimal. This is a massive waste of my time. He turns to me and says, “So will you help me?”

Will I help him? I don’t think I can. Or rather, I don’t know where to start. He shows me a poster back in his office. It’s 2′ by 3′ and on it is written a quote from Margaret Mead, “Never doubt that a small group of thoughtful, committed citizens can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has.” Now I have chicken skin. The same poster, with the same quote, hangs in our office back at Neenan. This poster inspires my boss, David Neenan, a man dedicated to transforming the way design and construction is done. This poster brought me from Hawaii to The Neenan Company. This poster changed my life once. It was about to do it again. I turn to Dr Haug and say, “maybe we can do something.”


Subscribe to this blog to receive an email with Part 2 of this incredible story.

Kirsti

Bookmark and Share

Community: Beyond the Building…

March 2nd, 2010

When was the last time you built something and what was it? Do you know who built your house? Your neighborhood? Your school?   These day strangers build buildings in our communities. Sometimes, if we are lucky, they will use local skills and expertise.  But then they leave, whatever community partnerships existed are torn apart.

Canada

It wasn’t always that way.  In 17th and 18th century rural North America, many people called a farm “home,” and neighbors usually lived without instant communication and miles apart.  This required “neighborhoods” to actually gather in order to interact socially and help each other out.  Barn raisings became one of the ways for communities to supply the necessary number of hands to literally build buildings and community.  Members in these communities understood that individual success was connected to community success, and the barn raising process helped individuals feel personally invested and connected with a well-developed sense of place.  Raising a barn provided space for people to share feelings of belonging, renew commitment to collective values and community pride and then celebrate accomplishment.

Here at The Neenan Company, we also think working with individuals and communities over the long term is important. You’ll find us involved well before the first shovel full of earth is turned and well after the last screw is turned.  Just last month for example, Center Consolidated School District held a Collaborative Design work session where high school students shared ideas on the design of the school as its actual users.  We also managed to keep Estes Park Elementary School open while 20,000 square feet was added on.  Keeping students safe while fulfilling their curiosity at the same time, Greg Ching gave class presentations in a construction zone to update them on the addition.  Employees, board members and community representatives of Tri-Valley Health Systems in Cambridge, NE literally inscribed community into the new Cambridge Memorial by putting their signatures on a steel beam while the building is under construction.

Tri-Valley steel beam with signatures.

But we don’t just leave it at the level of the building. During his time in Cheyenne Wells, Colorado, Jim Ferguson was named “Mayor for the Day” in honor of his community involvement.

Jim Ferguson as Mayor for the Day.

Mayor for the Day, in

Greg Ching has been known to volunteer in assisting high school football coaches and players on defensive tactics and techniques in Cheyenne Wells, Sterling and Estes Park, at the end of long days running his job sites.

In Kremmling, Colorado, the West Grand PK-8 school stands out as the community’s biggest building and its ribbon cutting was the biggest event of Winter 2008.  Hundreds of parents, students, community members, and neighbors from other communities came to see the new gym, computer lab, council room and learning spaces.

Finally, in case you thought it didn’t get any better, we love to help out with the Meeker Classic, a premier sheepdog herding competition and the biggest annual event in the Meeker, Colorado community.  Neenan employees can be found parking cars, directing traffic and sponsoring dogs in this particular celebration of community.

As Millard Fuller, US humanitarian and Habitat for Humanity founder once said, “For a community to be whole and healthy, it must be based on people’s love and concern for each other.” At Neenan, we like to make visible and celebrate how community ownership empowers real people. Because it’s not about the building, it’s what the building enables us all to do and how to be!

Thanks for the photos wikipedia and tazimodo.

Deborah-Eve

Bookmark and Share

Stepping up design for better health

March 1st, 2010

We’ve talked here before about how design can help patients heal faster or help us be more productive at work. But what about design itself as both cause and solution to contemporary public health issues and epidemics like obesity, diabetes and heart disease?

Usually when we think of epidemics we think of an infectious outbreak that quickly sweeps across the land. Check out the map below though and you’ll see how obesity has a similar pattern. It might take longer than an outbreak, but the degree to which our collective bodies have changed in just 20 years is astounding:

Think of  your average day, and notice the ways your path from home to work and back again is designed so that walking is minimized. Cars, elevators, drive-thru windows…according to Karen Lee, deputy director of New York City’s Bureau of Chronic Disease Prevention and Control, “We have essentially designed mobility out of our lives.” We make choices that are most convenient for us. Sure, designers and policymakers helped create these conveniences, but it’s just as possible to engineer our built environment to be convenient in a way that also takes us on more active paths. In fact, a growing body of research around the connection between architecture and activity suggests that design can indeed make a difference to our bodies.

New York City is one place where local government officials in a multi-agency collaboration recently unveiled a set of “active design guidelines” intended for architects, designers, and building owners. The idea is to create neighborhoods and buildings that will remedy health issues resulting from inactivity. In the 19th century, design effectively helped to combat infectious diseases like cholera and typhoid (then the leading causes of death) through sanitation systems and upgrading dank, airless tenement housing with better building codes.  The question now is if design strategies can be used to combat 21st century killers like obesity, diabetes, and heart disease.

The guidelines are a pretty common-sense toolkit of strategies to tweak the exterior and interior built environment so people are directed toward choosing more active ways to move through their days.  On the outside, it’s thinking about active commuting and recreation – better access to public transportation, mixed uses in neighborhoods to encourage walking as well as access to fresh foods, and ensuring that streets aren’t just for cars but safe for cyclists and pedestrians. Indoors, it’s more about activity in your daily routine – using design to steer people toward the stairs as more attractive and convenient than the elevator, for example.

Nothing too radical, really. But just like how a few chips here and a candy bar there can add up to unwanted extra poundage around the middle, all these little bursts of activity throughout the day could be a promising solution to same.

So what do you think – do designers have a role to play (or even a responsibility) in improving public health through active design? Should they?

With thanks to Timothy Valentine and ITDP-Europe for their actively appealing images.

Amy L. Faust

Bookmark and Share

Calling all stormtroopers!

February 25th, 2010

Imagine being able to ‘walk through’ your new building before a shovel of dirt has been lifted. Climbing stairs. Entering a lobby. Imagine designing spaces with just a few strokes of the keyboard. Welcome to Ben and Jody’s world!

No longer are architectural drawings and cumbersome models with limited audiences the only ways clients can visualize and promote projectsToday, computers have changed how architectural “models” are made and Neenan is part of this revolution with a design team in-house who create and produce digital graphics. I visited Ben Shepherd and Jody Garrett to see how they manipulate space and bring projects to life.

I met Ben and Jody in their studio, a space completely full of the latest animation software and giant state-of-the-art computer screens. Ben trained in interior design and architecture, and Jody studied printmaking. Their backgrounds in art and creative problem solving along with years of computer experience have prepared them to work with designers, architects and clients to make short movies about Neenan projects. Using the same software used by the major motion picture industry, Ben and Jody animate architectural drawings, ideas and client dreams. For example, they can fabricate videos that a client might use to lease space before the first nail in the project has been pounded.

These movies are designed to capture audience attention, tell stories and entertain. They combine the best of movie making, commercials and architectural models in an exciting and riveting few minutes. Jody and Ben showed me examples of how state-of-the-art animation can make a building seem to appear out of thin air or unfold like an enormous Transformer toy. Other examples allow a viewer to soar through space and float through hallways and office spaces.  Keeping the design process in-house allows clients and Neenan staff to work collaboratively as they design spaces and communicate what those spaces will do. Can you imagine how exciting it is to peer over Ben and Jody’s shoulders as they make your project appear on screen? I’m still not completely convinced that I didn’t actually visit the spaces I experienced in the videos!

Working with architects and interior designers, Jody and Ben pay attention to minute details to create the interiors and areas surrounding a building. If you want to promote the location of other businesses in relation to your building project, they can place your project into context, right down to making sure that roads, trees and landscaping appear in place by using Google Maps. Once Jody and Ben have worked their magic, the finished digital product can be propelled electronically around the globe.

So what do Jody and Ben do when they aren’t working as a creative team with short turn around times to change the way you and I experience buildings? It seems they just can’t stop bringing things to life in the third dimension. Last year, Ben’s Storm Trooper Halloween costume materialized from cardboard and duct tape with an old bumper for the necessary blaster donated generously by Jody. This year, they hope to bring you more demo samples of Neenan movie projects they have created together.  So watch this space!

It’s not just about the building!
Deborah-Eve
Bookmark and Share

Buildings and Brains: Beyond the Box

February 23rd, 2010

Current brain research supports what architects and designers have long known–that we can construct spaces that relax, inspire, awaken, comfort or heal.  Our built environments encourage creativity, keep us focused and alert, lead to relaxation and social intimacy, and play a role in treating medical disorders.  Ceiling height affects brain function. Our brains also seem to be hard wired to avoid sharp angles and their danger.  Interior colors affect our ability to remember words and details, and therefore task performance. We thought we would do some research of our own on the connections between buildings and brains, so we asked some Neenan employees, who design, build and inhabit spaces every waking moment of their lives, what buildings and aspects of buildings inspire them, and why.  Here’s what we got!

Kittredge Building, Denver.

Reflecting Craftmanship – The Kittredge Building in Denver, Colorado, chosen by Tony Fiore, Preconstruction Manager. “People and situations inspire me – buildings just house people. I am most impressed by buildings that are made of stone or masonry because they reflect the craftsmanship of the people who built them.  One example is The Kittredge building in downtown Denver, where the Paramount Theatre is located.”

Chapel of St. Ignatius, Seattle

Enlightening Materials – Chapel of St. Ignatius, Seattle, Washington, chosen by Kathryn Kurtz, Senior Interior Designer. “Materials (such as concrete, drywall, plaster and wood) are celebrated in their simplest form in this little chapel in Seattle, WA.  Steven Holl unfolds an experience through the use of form, contrast, and light. The interior patterns that are created in plaster and revealed when washed with natural light are especially delightful.  The interior of this chapel is awe provoking and calm. One is pulled through the space at a leisurely gate exploring all the little architectural treasures that Steven has created.”

Denver International Airport, Denver, CO.

Personal Accomplishment – Denver International Airport, Denver, Colorado – chosen by Jim Ferguson, General Superintendent.  “DIA is my favorite building because I spent two-and-a-half years working on it and grew up working on that job.  It provided me with the overtime money to help me buy my first house, and gave me my first chance to manage a big project at a very hands-on level.”

Notre Dame, Paris, France.

Transcending Time – Notre Dame Cathedral, Paris, France – chosen by Dawn Nelson, Contracts & Risk Management Assistant. “To me, Notre Dame is an icon of timeless design and architecture.  It was a collaborative effort of many people and their ideas over 100+ years, including several architects and numerous workers that showed up every day to work on a project that they may never see finished in their lifetime.  They made an investment in something that would survive them to create a beautiful and useful structure for future generations to appreciate and enjoy.”

Budapest

Constant Companion – Hotel Gellért, Budapest, Hungary - chosen by Greg Bundy, Database Administrator. “This historic Art Nouveau building was built in 1916 on the banks of the Danube River and at the foot of a rugged hillside.  It was one of the first sights I saw when I first arrived in Budapest and has been my favorite ever since.  And now that I live here, it’s just a few minutes’ walk from my home!”

The White House, Washington D. C.

Iconic Cornerstone – The White House, Washington, DC – chosen by Mark Schneider, Project Manager. “The White House is a cornerstone of American symbolism standing since the late 1700s and housing all American presidents since John Adams.  It’s architectural style represents early settlement in our country and its expansion since conception also represents a growing nation. To me, it is one of a few symbols predominately associated with this nation.”

The Guiness Storehouse, Dublin, Ireland.

Source of Sustenance – The Guinness Storehouse, Dublin, Ireland – chosen by Mackenzie Daley, Marketing Manager. “The juxtaposition of the old exterior (original brewhouse) with the modern interior (central core mimics an inverted pint glass) is striking as a tribute to the history and future of Guinness. The curvy glass naturally guides you through the brewing process with a waterfall and mini hops farm. Finally, the top is a 360° bar where you can sip a fresh Guinness (my favorite beer) and look at the panoramic view of Dublin.”

Guggenheim Museum, New York, New York

Inspiring Work – Guggenheim Museum, New York City, New York - chosen by John James, Design Manager. “My favorite building is the Guggenheim Museum in New York City by Frank Lloyd Wright.  I first visited it in 1962 and it was instrumental in my decision to become an architect. It is gorgeous, inside and out; it is completely uncharacteristic of any other architecture in NYC; its atrium is as beautiful a space as can be found on the entire planet.”

Basillica

Structuring Wonder – Basilica of Our Lady of Peace of Yamoussoukro, Yamoussoukro , Cote d’Ivoire, West Africa – chosen by Jesse Johnston, Project Manager.  “It is an amazing structure. The courtyard holds over 750,000 people, 250,000 more than the population of the city in which it was built. It has nine active elevators installed in the internal columns of the main frame structure. It can seat 18,000 attendees inside. St. Peter’s Basilica can fit inside this one structure. It is also a magnificent undertaking for constructors. The logistics to build this with local and international help was a great undertaking.”

Which buildings inspire you and why? What features of theirs do you seek in your home and elsewhere? We would love to hear your thoughts!

Thanks for the photos Jeffrey Beall,  Sacred DestinationsDreaming TigerSlices of Lightex novoOZinOHBill Glover, and Coryu.

Deborah-Eve

Bookmark and Share

If we build it, will they come? Building a case for Critical Access Hospitals

February 22nd, 2010

“Never worry about numbers. Help one person at a time and always start with the person nearest you.” Mother Theresa

Common sense (and much research) dictates that investing in healthcare access allows for greater early diagnoses and for community residents to become stewards of their own health care. By providing care where it is needed, when it is needed, a proactive and responsive approach to health and care ultimately leads to decreased costs for the individual and their community. Providing access to top quality care is, therefore, critically important in rural communities, where your ability to reach care in the ‘golden hour’ after severe trauma can save your life. Yet it is also most difficult for these communities to sustain economically.

Rural communities and those who run critical access hospitals know well that when patients leave their community for primary care or selected services, they are unlikely to return. To stem this flow of health care migration, many communities have rallied to replace their critical access facilities.The first Rural Hospital Replacement Facility Study in 2004 was constructed to understand the benefits and barriers to facility investments from communities undertaking such work.  Now in its fifth year, the 2009 annual study, conducted by Stroudwater Associates and sponsored by The Neenan Company and Dougherty Mortgage LLC, has just been released. Of the 82 hospitals that have been replaced in the last five years, 62 participated in this year’s study. They shared challenges, problems and successes they experienced when transforming their facilities. This year has been especially unique however, as replacement facilities faced similar economic challenges to the rest of the country. Yet despite excessive debt payments, the hospital CEOs who participated in the study were undeterred. Replacing their facilities was critical to their community’s health. Here’s why.

1. Replacement facilities improved physician recruitment. Higher quality infrastructure supports higher quality staff, increases employee pride in their workplace and assists with recruiting talented people. More than that, the number of staff required per unit of care decreased as replacement facilities also improve a hospital’s operational efficiency. In the study, CEOs reported that physicians had been proactive in seeking out openings in their facilities and waiting lists for nursing staff interested in working in replacement CAHs are growing.

2. Replacement facilities increased patient volume. With newly replaced facilities designed to accommodate more outpatient than inpatient services, the study used a measure of “adjusted patient days” to evaluate total volumes. Two years post-replacement, total volumes had seen a median percentage increase of 8% across 53 hospitals. Years 2 and 3 saw an additional 5.8% and 6.3% growth, respectively, with years 4 and 5 reporting 3-4% each. These figures are significant given our economic situation and the desire among CEOs and rural communities to improve patient access while positively impacting operations and the bottom line.

3. Replacement facilities improved CAH competitiveness. To gauge the economic threat to such benefits, a new question was added to this year’s study concerning how the recent economic downturn had affected patient volumes and hospital operations. Results were mixed. A number of CEOs interviewed in the study reported that their facilities had helped them be more competitive in attracting patients in a bad economy as others reported volumes being above expectations. Still, unemployment rates, job security concerns and decisions against elective surgeries all impacted patient demand for services, and many CEOs reported increases in charity care and bad debt.

Regenerating care facilities, developing new services, retaining providers to improve care and inviting patients to access care, are all excellent reasons to replace facilities and enhance the economic, social and physical health of rural communities. Pulling a community together to invest in such facilities allows us to provide better support to each other and design what we need on our own terms. It also keeps care and money in the community, encouraging social and economic health. We urge you to check out the full report here.

Kirsti

Bookmark and Share

A doctor, an architect, and a biologist walk into a bar…

February 18th, 2010

…or, rather, a laboratory. Sounds like the start to a potentially bad joke, right? But a few visionary thinkers in these fields are currently mixing a up cocktail of design, architecture and biochemistry with a dash of science fiction. Dr. Rachel Armstrong gave the talk below (and many other lectures like it) last year to put forth the provocative idea that a truly sustainable built environment will require building materials that aren’t just green, but, alive:

We’re not talking about roof vegetation here. Instead of only consuming energy like buildings do now, Armstrong’s “metabolic materials” would create “living architecture” that might absorb or create energy from the environment. Sounds strange, right? Not so fast. Armstrong works from the premise that 1) there is a climate crisis facing the planet and 2) an architecture crisis is contributing to it. With a growing global population and building demand to match, it should come as no surprise that 40% of greenhouse gas emissions come from the building sector. So while Armstrong and her collaborators don’t dismiss alternative energy and green building practices, they clearly see them as insufficient for the truly sustainable buildings and cities we’ll need in the future.

To that end they’re experimenting with materials that aren’t just environmentally friendly or inspired by the natural world (such as biomimicry).  Instead, they’re going way beyond by creating materials that might someday communicate and respond to the world around them. Their current work takes inert matter (right now they’re using fat-like globs) and zaps it to life in the lab. The live cells (”protocells”) can then be programmed to have specific functions and behave in certain ways. Depending on the function, those cells can, for example, create new matter out of the environment around them.

Armstrong’s crew is currently applying these ideas conceptually to Venice, which is sadly sinking into the sea. If protocells could be programmed to convert carbon dioxide from the ocean and atmosphere to limestone (kind of like how the skeletons of little coral animals over time form a reef), and then released into the sea under Venice, they could essentially grow a substructure from the bottom up and keep Venice afloat. This would have the added bonus of capturing and permanently storing excess CO2. It’s a crude beginning experiment for where they see this technology going, which could eventually morph into buildings with living membranes that can be programmed to create their own energy, or even repair themselves when damaged. But it’s fantastic.

Fantastic and somewhat controversial. This type of technology, especially creating artificial life, brings up a host of ethical, environmental, and technical questions and it’s easy to scoff at the impractical thought of our buildings building themselves. You have to admit though, on a techie science geek level, it’s fun to consider. It’s also certainly visionary to think so far outside the box of current practices, but does the key to a sustainable built environment lie in buildings that behave like biological organisms?  Or should we concentrate our energy on using good old-fashioned inert materials but using them better?

How would you like to work in a living building?

Thanks to TED for the video, and ex_magician and roofoftwo for the images.

Amy

Bookmark and Share

Dude, Where’s My Trash Can?

February 17th, 2010

Garbage in, garbage out. Boy, is that old, lazy thinking. Today, there is no such thing as garbage.

The ancient axiom that one man’s trash is another’s treasure has never been truer than today—energy entrepreneurs are turning farm waste into electricity, for instance; old tires fuel paper mills; plastic bottles are transformed into high-fashion outerwear; glass shards become pavement; lawn clippings and stale food become garden fertilizer. Cattle are fed carrot trimmings in Oregon, and in Washington state the #1 recycled item is concrete, old buildings being pulverized on-site into aggregate for new buildings.

Sounds great, but the sad fact is that barely a third of America’s garbage is recycled; the waste stream continues to grow, and spoiled Americans generate more than 250 million tons of garbage. Yep—a quarter-billion tons, almost 5 pounds per person per day.

Unbelievable, yes?

Here at The Neenan Company we set out a few years ago to boost recycling and minimize waste, and since we delight in pushing the envelope our company recycling committee didn’t just ask nicely. In fact, asking nicely doesn’t work—human beings are creatures of habit and recycling “education” tends to be about as productive as “suggesting” teenagers do their homework. Frustrated by lack of results, TNC recycle advocates decided on provocative action:

Our garbage cans disappeared.

That’s right—we came to work one morning and all the garbage receptacles were gone. If we had something to throw away we couldn’t. If it couldn’t be recycled it had to, um, go in a drawer, or on the floor, or in a sock or something.

“Dude, where’s my trash can?” it was called.

It caused a furor. People growled at recycle committee members, who had substituted recycle bins for garbage cans. Little piles of trash appeared on the desks of recycling advocates. And this is a company composed of thoughtful professionals!

But the recycling committee didn’t bend. Full-size trash cans never did return to our offices; full-size recycling bins took their place, and over time we all changed our habits and, just as important, our perceptions. Done with lunch, the paper sack goes in the recycle bin or, better yet, back home to use again. The Tupperware bin—back home to use again. Bottles and cans, into the recycle bin, of course. Food waste: We have compost bins in the kitchen. And so on—as we said at the start of this entry, almost nothing is really “garbage” any more.

Over all, The Neenan Company reduced its office waste 83 percent. In other words, more than 4/5ths of what we had previously tossed in the trash now is going to recycling. As a company, we support and patronize construction debris recyclers, reducing our project waste stream 88 percent, and that substantially reduces our project costs as a whole. We pay far less for office garbage service. And we have a real-life appreciation for recycling and reuse that we apply to all our projects and pass on to our clients.

Many cities such as Fort Collins, our home town, are looking at ways to reduce garbage and boost recycling. In some places, such as Seattle, it is now against the law to put recyclable materials in the garbage. We say—Great!

In an indulgent, throwaway society based on convenience, the problem isn’t usefulness, it’s laziness. The way we see it now, everything’s a resource.

With thanks to Curtis Gregory Perry for his trash cans!

Eric Lucas is the coauthor, with David Neenan, of No Excuses: Be the Hero of Your Own Life.

Bookmark and Share

Performance + Pay = Better Education?

February 16th, 2010

Colorado’s bid for $377 million in “Race to the Top” federal funds to revamp its education system is indicative of the traction increasing around compensation for teachers based on their performance. The reforms Colorado is considering with respect to teacher pay are pretty provocative, as no major educational system in the U.S. has implemented a merit pay system for educators so far. For years Colorado has been at the forefront of promoting merit pay for teachers, even holding a grant contest of its own before Obama even took office. Just a couple of weeks ago the Harrison school district announced that it will be the first district in the region to pay teachers based on how well their students do. What is this trend and what does it mean for schools and teachers?

Eight years after the No Child Left Behind Act (NCLB) was enacted, a federal presence in education isn’t a novel concept. NCLB mandates that any state receiving federal education funding set academic standards. Students in certain grades are then given standardized tests with the goal of eventually achieving 100% proficiency in the tests. With all of the data generated on student performance from the tests, schools are also held to standards on student performance. Results are reported to parents, and if a school falls short they’re required to take action or face sanctions – so there’s a big element of transparency and accountability as well.

If NCLB was about setting standards for students, the Obama administration is focusing on quality: teacher quality and quality of the educational experience. Rather than a sweeping national mandate though, Obama and Secretary of Education Arne Duncan are offering an incentive in the form of Race to the Top grants to cash-strapped state governments. The goal is to encourage states to embrace certain education reforms, and linking teacher pay to student performance is a big one. But why?

Teacher compensation is generally fixed based on how long a teacher has worked in the profession and his or her level of education. The jury is out on the effectiveness of merit pay’s impact on student achievement, but it’s pretty clear that the fixed pay model allows some less-dedicated teachers to coast while good teachers receive the same compensation. One criticism of merit pay is that it’s quite challenging to design a system that’s fair. But then again, is the status quo really just?

A major source of the current dysfunction stems from the lack of consistent evaluation. How is it that the system responsible for evaluating children for 13 years is ironically without any clear method to evaluate those doing the teaching? In essence, it’s impossible to pin any blame on “bad teachers” if we don’t even know what “bad” means. Similarly, how can we encourage and replicate “good” performance?

A system for merit pay also adds another layer of complexity to the educational system. Merit pay implies competition – do better than everyone and you’ll be compensated for it. This is why a credible system of evaluation is so essential. The Harrison district is an interesting case, with a plan that outlines raises in compensation alongside raises in proficiency. Teachers move to the next grade if they meet the criteria for performance and student achievement results. Each succeeding level requires a higher degree of mastery and demonstrated results. Teachers were consulted, gave inputs on designing the system, and are on board with the plan.

We are all motivated differently to excel at what we do. For some, it’s the intrinsic rewards that come simply from loving an activity. Others are driven by outside incentives like money or accolades. Designing compensation systems that not only appeal to teachers’ motivation but also foster a dynamic and healthy learning environment for both students and teachers take serious work. Will Colorado be a leader and a model for driving change in school districts across the U.S.? What do you think?

With thanks to   jakevol, Adam & Tess, and DRB62 for the fine photos.

Amy

Bookmark and Share