Unraveling Healthcare Reform in 2012

January 23rd, 2012

Len Nichols, Director of the Center for Health Policy Research and Ethics at George Mason University, is known for advocating healthcare reforms that increase care without negating hospital business needs. Nichols’ group, Health CEOs for Health Reform, helps policy makers see that delivery system reform and health insurance reform are both complementary and necessary.  In a 2009 piece for the New America Foundation, Nichols summarized his position as, “we can achieve many of the goals of public plan advocates while preserving fair and effective market competition, negating the risk of excess cost-shift, and avoiding a potential progression toward a single-payer health system.” Today, debates over healthcare are still top news as politicians, hospitals, and patients struggle to come together on a way forward.

Nichols’ argues, for example, that it’s not possible to tackle costs without tackling coverage. Hospitals lose money on Medicare already; reducing coverage puts them on the hook, and on the defensive, against change. But if the hospitals are not on board, then changes in policy will not occur either.Because even without policy reform, hospitals are businesses that continually seek to cut costs. FierceHealthcare identified cost-cutting trends to keep an eye on that include mergers and consolidations, which theoretically lead to less expensive care, but also head down the risky road to monopoly. Person-centered trends also always seem to veer back to policy debates. Reducing readmissions for instance, has great cost-cutting benefits, but involves a different set of care incentives in the first place, and support of hospital alternatives in the long run. As you can see, healthcare is a complex machine, with many moving parts!

In 2011, in response to January’s state of the union address, Nichols railed against the Republican party’s healthcare policy, “The biggest chasm between these competing visions of a better health care system is this: Democrats are for making sure all Americans can sit at our health care table of plenty, and are willing to change the rules and incentives so that insurers and providers will have a self-interest in enabling that happy outcome, and are willing — yes – to tax ourselves so the less fortunate can afford it. Republicans are for lower tax rates and less government, regardless of the health consequences for our citizens who cannot afford what those with market power want to charge. Republicans apparently do not think that the lack of coverage of tens of millions Americans, nor the unsustainable health care cost growth that is really killing jobs, are worthy of serious collective effort.  I wish they would just say that, or that Democrats were more skilled in making them admit it, to clarify the issues before American voters.”

As 2012 begins and we enter another election year, do you think lower taxes could lead to better care and healthier hospital profits? Or is it the other way around? What are you willing to trade off for better healthcare?

Images credits: Syntopia, Daniel Abendroth, Stuart Conner

Daniela Morell

Bookmark and Share

Collaborative Design for Wellbeing

January 18th, 2012

The collaborative design process at Neenan has always been central to its archistruction philosophy and usually involves designing for a particular purpose as well as physical dimensions and values.

Recently however, Neenan architect Michelle Fisher and her team had an extraordinary opportunity to collaboratively design a space for wellbeing, based only on an ‘energy.’ Gone were specific and concrete discussions of doors, window, other design features, and branding concepts. Instead, the team had to imagine an energy that would heighten and sustain people’s connection to the healing power of the natural world.

.

So the team set to work, researching the many different cultural structures which demonstrated the healing energy of the natural environment when connected to the human spirit. Images of kivas, medicine wheels, sweat lodges, labyrinths, greenhouses, and meditation spaces all came to mind, referencing the spirit of nature and humanity. It was important that the design of the space blend seamlessly into its environment with minimal impact. Strength, balance, sustainability, stewardship, tactile beauty, durability and accessibility became values to be built into, and communicated through, the built environment. A sensual stillness was to pervade the space to encourage a very human connection to the land on which we all stand.

This powerful vision of a life-giving and supporting energy for all those that entered the space radically changed the collaborative design process Neenan embarks on with each client. Profoundly human centered and incorporating active design elements, Michelle and her team focused on ways in which to invite the natural environment into the space, but also into the bodies that would exist within it. Ideas of ”procession” guided how people would move through the space.

.

Drawing once more on sacred design and ancient spiritual traditions, the design team came up with a wall of geometrical and sacred shapes, as well as images of spiritual sources of energy to inspire design. A “resonance of being” emerged, featuring textured stone paths which act as reflexology stimulants for feet that meet them. Walkways followed the river through the space, complete with flatbed stones as meditation cushions. A spiral, nautilus shell-like path into the conference space was designed to encourage descent into the life force of the earth. To encourage sensory wellness, designers came up with ways in which the senses could be activated in the space, such as orange trees around the grounds, a night sky view from inside the building for star-gazing, south facing courtyard so all could benefit from the sun, a labyrinth of red willows, and water at the building’s entry.

.

The designers also considered productive spaces for the human-environment connection. Greenhouses emerged for growing the organic food the center would use in its dining areas. A canning kitchen was proposed to preserve nature’s bounty. Expansive rooms for congregation and communal dining and sharing became part of the space, not to mention spa and healing treatment spaces, a bookstore, grocery store and small cabins. All these spaces were inspired by a healing energy and its manifestation in the built environment.

How will you seek out different entry points to creativity and collaboration in 2012?

.

With thanks to Sergiu Bacioiu, Jack Heart, einarfour and eren {sea+prairie} for their art!

Kirsti

Bookmark and Share

Peering into the future: Talking about waste and change in healthcare

January 12th, 2012

In December 2011, as he stepped down from the Centers of Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS), Don Berwick, MD, shared his experiences in DC and healthcare reform with the Institute for Healthcare Improvement (IHI). His two enduring commitments, both through his tenure with CMS and within the speech were, “Remember the patient,” and, “Help those who help others.” “Berwick constantly drew on these commitments over his time in Washington and neverending policy meetings. Towards the end of his speech, he proposed six forms of waste currently polluting the healthcare experience and preventing the accomplishment of his two commitments — Overtreatment, Failures of Coordination, Failures of Reliability, Administrative Complexity, Pricing Failures, and Fraud and Abuse.

Accountable Care Organizations have been promoted as a way of reducing Berwick’s six forms of waste and 2011 brought an emerging trend of mergers and acquisitions as healthcare organizations attempted to grow and transform themselves. However, not everyone was convinced this was the answer to society’s healthcare problems. Jason Shafrin contended that such industry consolidation could lead to better care coordination but also reduced competition. On the topic of costs and who should receive care (as well as where and how), Austin Frakt discussed both explicit and implicit rationing and their impactful patient consequences in a slimmed-down Medicare and Medicaid scenario. John Halamka’s post on “What keeps me up at night” laid out his concerns over workforce, IT and governance dimensions of the reforms; while David Harlow took issue with the Accountable Care Organizational form directly, calling it a camel (horse designed by a committee). As a result, Harlow argued, “it is critically important for healthcare providers to begin now — if they have not already begun — to take a broader view of the patient encounter, to get a firm grasp of their own costs and the costs of their partners, and to start thinking about the power of collaboration.”


Between Berwick’s responsibilities to the patient and those who help others, and debates over the changing healthcare landscape, it was difficult to know what was in store for the public as 2011 wound down. So we asked several well known healthcare writers, bloggers, and innovators about their thoughts on what 2012 would bring to the ever-changing healthcare landscape. Here is what they had to say…

.

David Harlow attacked the issue of waste directly, arguing, “We need to do more with less before we bankrupt the system.  Cost and quality may be addressed by health care providers through greater integration and through leveraging health IT to improve care at both individual and population levels.  In part, this will be done through shifting some in-person care to remote monitoring and services delivered via purpose-built networks as well as through existing social networks.  This approach underpins the development of accountable care organizations, but in the future it will support even more efficient models of care delivery and financing.”

Mark Graban, however, took another angle. He responded, “Successful healthcare leaders are looking to simultaneously improve quality and cost, realizing that the full engagement of their staff and physicians in the adoption of “Lean” mindsets and methods leads to improved quality and patient safety, which leads to lower cost. The most sustainable improvements come from moving beyond Lean tools and isolated projects, adopting a new way of thinking and managing in the Lean model.”

Mark Scrimshire came from the patient’s perspective stating, “People need 2B more directly engaged in their own vitality. More aware of costs and benefits. Dealing with bigger health bureaucracies.”

.

.

While John Sharp of the Cleveland Clinic added that, “ACOs could definitely reduce waste. But coordination of care in chronic illness is key.”

.

Indeed, size and coordination of efforts seem to be themes that will continue to haunt healthcare reform as we enter 2012. But there are also their consequences for patients, indeed, any individual maneuvering through this system. In response to these concerns, Berwick concluded his speech to the IHI with the following call to action;

.

“Here is the lesson I bring you from 16  months in Washington, DC.  Your time has come.  You are on the cusp of history – you, not Washington, are the bridge between the dream and the reality – or else there will be no bridge.  Our quest – for health care that is just, safe, infinitely humane, and that takes only its fair share of our wealth – our quest may not be as magnificent as the quest for human rights or for a sustainable earth, but it is immensely worthy.  You stand, though you did not choose it, at the crossroads of momentous change – at the threshold of majesty.  And – frightened, fortunate, or both – you now have a chance to make what is possible, real.”

.

Perhaps, 2012 will be the year of the patient-provider partnership. How do you think healthcare reform will change your healthcare experience over the next year?

Kirsti

Bookmark and Share

Engines and Energy Conversion Lab — A lifelong tale of essential innovation

December 22nd, 2011

“You haven’t really seen an engine until you’ve climbed inside one.” Sachin Joshi

As the world attends to developing alternative and renewable sources of energy, the Engines and Energy Conversion Laboratory is undergoing a physical renaissance. Harnessing the building’s historical legacy as well as its embedded energy and aesthetic beauty, the current expansion-renovation project will focus on how the lab’s environment can serve as the building’s own engine. This project is the latest chapter in the tale of the Engines Lab — A tale of innovation as essence, a life giving property, and evolving experimentation and adaptation.

When it was built in 1936, the building now known as the Engines and Energy Conversion Laboratory (EECL) was the Fort Collins Power Plant. A beautiful art deco utility building complete with terracotta art deco fountain, the power plant was constructed in the midst of the Great Depression through the Works Progress Administration of the federal government. A central highlight of the former ‘City Beautiful’ (as Fort Collins was known in the 30s), it should come as no surprise that the power plant would experience life as an art gallery in the 1980s! However, it wasn’t until 1992, when Bryan Willson established the Engines and Energy Conversion Lab and began work on a massive engine from Southern California Gas Company that the building truly came to life. Now, the Engines Lab is known as one of the nation’s top academic laboratories, one its largest independent energy labs, and as a world leader in developing large-scale solutions to global energy dilemmas.

Recently, NCBR published an article highlighting how vertical axis wind turbines would be installed during a renovation of the Engines Lab that will resemble the Old Power Plant’s 1930s style smokestacks and symbolize the Lab’s effort to shift from conventional to alternative forms of energy. This design idea came out of conversations between Neenan and the Engines lab and is just one example of how the ‘old meets new’ in this expansion-renovation project. In a recent interview with Bob Hosanna, lead Neenan architect on the Engines Lab, we discussed how other historical attributes of both the building and its site, will play a role in a flexible and dynamic mechanical system for both buildings.

Pursuing Leed Platinum for the Lab requires some creative, indeed visionary thinking. The Lab’s mechanical systems should not just be state of the art in 2013, but state of the art into the future. As an example of the innovation that is driving the process, Neenan identified a 4′ by 6′ disused tunnel from the Lab to the nearby railway line that can be be used to draw cooler air into the building. Additionally, the design team is investigating a closed loop system from the nearby river to cool the building. A water survey is also underway to explore possible greywater use for the Lab’s landscaping and fountain.

The EECL houses some of the foremost global energy innovators, larger engines than any other university research lab nationally, and welcomes over 2000 visitors each year from the community. Such a diverse audience provides the Lab and Neenan with various architectural and narrative challenges. The front lobby, for example, will tell the Lab’s visual story with a historical gallery featuring a kinetic sculpture, wooden water wheel and Woodward Governor (1870) that controlled the speed of waterwheel on display. Woodward was launched in 1870 based on that technology – the same year that CSU was launched as Agricultural College of Colorado. As a result, the lobby speaks to the Lab’s history as a place of working art, as well as its longstanding relationship with the university.

The larger, traditional engines will remain housed in the older building. Algae, optics and laser ignition systems under development in-situ will then be showcased in the new extension. Such visual and visible displays of the building’s work as well as how the building is working; its essence as a living machine, open up opportunities for the building itself to be studied and experimented on. The Lab comes alive through the tale it tells, as well as through the environment that nourishes it.

In 2012, this blog will follow the expansion and renovation project at the Lab as it unfolds. Up next? Inside a Living Machine.

With thanks to Jules Antonio and Bugman for their images!

Kirsti

Bookmark and Share

Easy Money – Energy Efficiency Incentives

December 15th, 2011

Everybody loves free money.   As a kid I can remember labeling “mad money” any green that was found or given to me.  “Mad money” was immediately spent on stuff that disappeared almost as fast as it was found.  The energy efficiency incentives I am writing about are usually more “mad money” than I could have ever dreamed of as a child.  I would think that you or your client will find plenty of uses for a “gift” received for doing the right thing in terms of energy efficiency.

With the help of the Database of State Incentives for Renewable and Efficiency (DSIRE) you can one-stop shop to find the financial incentives available to you, no matter where you live in the United States.   Come armed knowing your utility provider(s) and you might be rewarded like we were on our latest school project, $154,000 for our client and $24,500 for the Design Team, and this was only through our utility provider, Xcel Energy.

Start by selecting the state where your project is located.   What comes next is a long list of financial incentives available for your project, both residential and commercial.  Click on the hyperlink and you are conveniently taken to the incentive provider’s website for more detailed information.  Where should your search for this “mad money” begin?   Utility providers are often your best source for incentive programs.  There also could be a state program that will give you some assistance.  Don’t forget to look for financing, property tax and sales tax incentives too.

Then there’s the federal government.  At the top of the DSIRE webpage you’ll see “View Federal Incentives”.   Click on this hyperlink to find a host of ways the federal government is trying to help you be more energy efficient.  Of particular interest should be the federal Energy Policy Act of 2005.  Established as a tax deduction for energy-efficient commercial buildings, it has been extended to December 31, 2013.  One can earn anywhere from $0.30 – $1.80 per square foot, depending on technology and the amount of energy reduction you achieve.  Included in this program is the building envelope and interior lighting, heating, cooling, ventilation and hot water systems.

Another often overlooked way to recover investments in energy efficiency upgrades is through depreciation deductions.  Thanks to The Tax Relief, Unemployment Insurance Reauthorization, and Job Creation Act of 2010 eligible property placed in service after September 8, 2010 and before January 1, 2012 qualifies for an 100% first-year bonus depreciation.    Having taken accounting in college during the summer session, I am no authority on what this all means.  But I’m guessing when you mention this to your tax accountant their eyes will light up knowing that your tax bill will decrease by a healthy amount. 

Eligible property includes:
  • Solar-electric and thermal technologies
  • Fuel cells and microturbines
  • Geothermal electric
  • Direct-use geothermal and geothermal heat pumps
  • Small wind (100 kW or less)
  • Combined heat and power (CHP)
  • Large wind facilities

I hope you will be as successful as Neenan has been with helping our clients find incentives for doing the right thing.  In our current economy, with budget cuts happening as frequently as a chicken lays eggs, who can say no to a gift for making your home or building project more energy efficient?

Thank you Images_of _Money, David Popoff, and Velo Steve for the images!

John Driot

Bookmark and Share

What Does A School Do? Online vs Physical Environments

December 9th, 2011

Good contemporary design embodies the notion that the built environment has both measurable and intuitive effects on the well-being of occupants. In an educational context, architecture shapes the destiny of students via comfortable, interactive, healthy spaces. These interiors must then be filled with committed teachers and teaching tools to create a school. Ideally, the building and its human inhabitants operate in harmony; but in many circumstances, this is not the case. What happens, for example, when grade-school education goes online and is separated from its physical architecture?

Online programs are gaining accreditation and popularity with mixed results, begging the question of what does a school really do. Indeed, accountability for school performance typically comes down to test scores, rather than health or emotional outcomes. Add to this that different theories of education can make student achievement difficult to define and the metrics for evidence based design get fuzzy. According to Neenan’s Director of Strategic Planning, Julie Stanek, the motto that “a good teacher can teach anywhere” obscures the impact of design on student achievement. It’s also a notion that puts a lot of extra pressure on teachers, even as learning takes on a more student-centered approach.

Knowledge today is highly transferable electronically. If it’s true that a good teacher can really teach anywhere, then the combination of internet-enabled intellectual exploration and online curriculums should be a winning combination. But learning still occurs in space, and the individual spaces of online students still seem to have a dramatic effect on the success of those programs. Recently, for example, Education Week was critical of online schools, quoting one student who said technology problems kept her from starting classes until September and the social isolation quickly convinced her that online was not a good fit.

Given the nature of school funding, this question is not just grounded in academics. Colorado is struggling with the problem of defectors from the online space returning en masse to their brick and mortar institutions after yearly funding allocations have been doled out on a per student basis, per location. The drop out rate of one in eight is also pretty grim. Finally, test scores for online learners vary, causing school performance statistics to also range widely.

Proponents of online learning say that it’s a fantastic tool for students in specific circumstances. According to one online gradeschool education provider, their system is designed for struggling students, advanced learners, homeschoolers, military or overseas kids, elite athletes and performers, and homebound children–all learners whose physical space differs from your usual ones. There is also an opportunity to create much broader learning communities that span geographic boundaries. All of these points make a lot of sense. It’s hard to argue that a student who can’t physically get to school should be denied educational opportunities, or that a gifted student shouldn’t get credit for distance learning. The messy part comes when for-profit online institutions recruit heavily from student populations that do have access to conventional education.

Human interaction is a critical part of the learning process, which is facilitated differently by the internet and by architecture. A building can do things that a computer cannot and vice versa. Learning online puts particular onus on the student to be self-motivated, whereas being in a classroom creates a physical channel to direct education. On the other hand, the internet offers limitless possibilities. The fact is, we learn different lessons in different spaces. So, If you had the chance, how would you direct learning space priorities and dollars?

Image credits: Svadilfari, arneboell, ModernDope

Daniela Morell

Bookmark and Share

Federal Cuts Menace Rural Healthcare Gains

December 8th, 2011

What’s in store for healthcare in America? This multi-billion dollar question affects us all differently; depending, among other things, on location.

Rural health initiatives have seen a lot of attention in recent years, for example, with a lot of excitement around the rise of Critical Access Hospitals. In 2010, the federal government promised $11 billion for these important centers in low-population areas. More money was also pledged to close the digital healthcare divide ensuing from the rise of electronic health records nationally. Rural facility replacement studies have been published as well, and financing avenues explored with gusto. But as debate rages on and on and on about government spending, rural healthcare initiatives are now taking a hit.

Back in March when America avoided a government shut down, some hard decisions were made. An $80 billion decision to cut government spending resulted in $600 million lost to existing community health centers nationally, according to the Washington Post. Plans for $335 million destined to increase medical, dental, prescription, and vision services were also dumped.

Over the next ten years, federal spending will be reduced by upwards of $1.2 trillion per the Budget Control Act of 2011. Rural Health Voices reports that rural hospitals are now in imminent danger. The details have not been hammered out, but several smart people have set their minds to it. President Obama’s plan would “end add-on payments for physicians and hospitals in frontier states, reduce CAH reimbursement to 100 percent of reasonable cost, and end CAH reimbursement for facilities located 10 miles or less from another hospital.” The Republican plan isn’t any sunnier by the way, with leadership seeking to “cut $2 billion from frontier state add-on payments and $14 billion from rural hospital reimbursement structures.”

Providing services to low population areas is a tough business and government withdrawals of support does not help matters. Physicians are watching closely to see how to continue providing care to their communities under changing circumstances. On the other hand, the healthcare industry is doing relatively well economically, with the White House announcing healthcare innovation as part of its initiatives to create jobs in rural areas as well as everywhere else.

As we enter 2012, the fate of American healthcare is anyone’s guess. The Supreme Court has agreed to hear the case of whether legislation requiring everyone to be covered is constitutional, electoral politics are heated, and the economy is in flux. What are your healthcare priorities? Do you think federal budget cuts are saviors or sinkers?

Image credits: DerrickT, tanzia45, JohnONolan

Daniela Morell

Bookmark and Share

Life Animated!

November 29th, 2011

A brief history on becoming a 3d animator.

When I was a kid, I couldn’t keep myself from creating.  I carved giant zucchinis from our garden into Viking ships, dragons, and submarines.  I built my own wings out of wooden rods and yellow fabric, only to strap them on, run down the street, and then get disappointed as I wasn’t able to take off and fly over my elementary school making all the other kids jealous.

Shark carved out of a squash

Shark carved out of a squash

My parents found out very early on that to keep me occupied all they had to do was put a project in my lap and I was good!   When I was very young, my dad surprised me with my very first snap-tight model.  It was an F-18 Hornet fighter plane. I immediately opened the box, took out the pieces and started trying to figure out how they went together, completely disregarding the instructions.  It was the very beginning of a trend that stuck.  Since then I have never really followed the instructions on anything. Instead I just try to fit the pieces together until the thing I’m working on finally comes together. 

In college I was going to major in art, but after my mother became very worried about my future potential for jobs, she found an alternative that I was ok with. I ended up majoring in Interior Design at CSU.  During the first semester of my sophomore year, a computer program was introduced to the department called 3ds Max, a 3D modeling program.             

I would say about 5 minutes into my first session with the program I fell madly in love with it, and I am happy to say that after 10 years we are still very committed to each other! 3ds Max is one of the most powerful 3D programs on the market. In addition to architecture and design, it has been used to help model characters and content for video games, as well as use for graphics in countless major motion pictures such as: Iron Man, Black Hawk Down, and Jurassic Park. I loved 3ds Max so much that every hour I wasn’t in class I was at the computer lab playing around in the program figuring out how to model a creature with a wheel for its back half,  or animate a space ship flying through an asteroid field.  Needless to say it was my passion.  The next year I was the teachers’ assistant to the 3D class, and then a paid professor my senior year.  Right after I got out of college I started at The Neenan Company, a perfect fit. I also managed to continue teaching for the next 6 years at CSU and Front Range Community College.

I have now been with Neenan for 7-1/2 years as a 3D animator.  I have been included on almost every aspect of the design of a project, from the initial design conception, to the final finished product, and all the marketing and sales pieces that follow. If someone needs to see what something will look like, or how the lights and colors affect a space, or where the shadows of a building are going to fall, they come to us. Being able to visualize is the most important part in Architecture and design! If a client doesn’t fully understand or can’t visualize a design, it can cause break downs that hurt the project and the relationship. One of the greatest advantages of using a 3d program is that you can bring the client into the space and make sure they see the building they are going to get before it has been built in full detail, from the flooring, to the soffits, to the custom water feature. Everything can be accomplished quickly and efficiently.  One of my favorite things at Neenan is being included in our Collaborative Design Process, where architects and designers, bring a building to life. The clients are blown away at how fast and easy it is to manipulate a building to suit their needs. In less than a day we can hash out a design or concept, and produce renderings and animations to give to the client.  

Over the years, the 3d programs have become more robust, added new features, and offered new tools.  Each time they are upgraded we are able to create and build faster, better, and more efficiently than before, and there is no end in sight.  There will always be amazing new technologies that bring us to the cutting edge and help us dazzle our clients. I plan on being right there to use them as they come into being.

If you are interested in learning 3d, get a hold of a program, download a free trial, take an online class, or go to a college that provides 3d courses.  There is no limit to what you can dream up!

Ben Shepard

Bookmark and Share

Racing Toward 2012: Challenges and Opportunities

November 14th, 2011

I have to admit that for my own sanity and productivity, I’ve stopped paying too much attention to the uncertainty of markets or the challenges ahead. Anecdotally, I’m seeing my peers fully employed more and more, yet Occupy Wall Street rages on and industry outlooks oscillate widely for 2012. However, there’s never a bad time for good design! Such slumps can be thought of as creative opportunities, but the intellectual wealth needs to be directed towards fresh commissions and stimulating work.

The design industry has struggled recently but signs of it crawling back to life are now apparent. According to AIA Chief Economist Kermit Baker, there was a thirty percent decrease in spending in the non-residential building sector in 2010. This year we’re looking at a 5.6 percent drop, but that should bounce back in 2012 with an estimated 6.4 percent increase. These precipitous drops and slow rebounds are due to a plethora of factors. Baker cites, for example, “unstable home prices, unusually severe weather conditions, rising energy costs, concern over growing debt, and the rising national unemployment rate” as challenges to the sector. The most exciting challenge for designers will be to come up with buildings and products that address these problems.

In the meantime, opportunities for architectural commissions are still strong overseas. World Architecture News surveyed top international firms and found that “China was held up by each practice as the saving grace for the architecture industry,” keeping firms busy, while elsewhere, work has been slower. At Perkins Eastman, Principal and Executive Director L. Bradford Perkins credits international work, along with lean operations and a balanced demographic-driven portfolio, that includes healthcare and education, as factors that have made 2011 the year of their return to the “new normal.” They are now moving into 2012 with confidence.

Healthcare, in particular, is a bright spot for architecture. The AIA predicts that healthcare construction will grow in 2012, which trends along with a stronger healthcare sector overall. HealthLeaders Media reports that the industry is on track to create 344,000 new jobs by the end of 2011. While that’s only a 0.02% drop in the bucket compared to the astounding 14 million people that the Bureau of Labor Statistics accounts for as unemployed in this country, it is still a strong indicator of opportunity. Of course, the healthcare industry faces plenty of challenges too. The Incidental Economist argues that healthcare wages are increasing, while productivity is decreasing. But new federal regulations being drafted for Accountable Care Organizations (ACOs) that steer healthcare professionals and hospitals toward collaborative efficiency will possibly help the sector’s growth become more sustainable.

Design and architecture will always be a reflection of the people who use it. As the economy changes, the built environment will change with it. It will be great when we get to a point where uncertainty about the future is not such a drag on industry. Until then, savoring the predictions may be a good idea. What’s your outlook for 2012?

Image credits: law_keven, poolie, HeyItsWilliam, D’Arcy Norman

Daniela

Bookmark and Share

From Hospital to Hospitable: Miguel Burbano shares why Hospitality Rules in Healthcare.

November 3rd, 2011

We recently spotlighted the work of Miguel Burbano de Lara, AIA, at Pediatric Associates of the Northwest and how his suggestions around workplace flow were brought into being, significantly changing the culture of the clinic as well as its work practices. Miguel has led several of Neenan’s healthcare projects, and we sought some of his time recently to discuss the emergence of a culture of hospitality in healthcare, how that had come about and whether it is truly applicable. Here’s what he had to share with us…

Why hospitality and why now?

A growing societal desire for comfort, as seen in the retail, airline and other industries, and as often demonstrated in the sound, light, smell, and vibration standards of a space is propelling similar expectations in healthcare; even though the industry has largely ignored such aspects of good service. Hospitals have historically been considered an inhospitable places – we go only when we really need something serious to happen to us. They were known in the past as ‘death houses’ and one really didn’t want to stay any longer than they had to. A contemporary focus on high efficiency and sophisticated technology has continued to make this environment, more scientifically clinical as well, in spite of considerable research and empirical evidence that a healing environment does not necessarily need to be highly efficient or technologically grounded. Indeed, Burbano shares, “individuals prefer, desire, and deserve, clean, safe and comfortable environments of care.”

So which dimensions of hospitality are relevant for healthcare settings?

For Burbano, the core question is “what can be done to improve the patient and family experience?” The ancient spa and bath houses in Europe and elsewhere knew the answer to this question — the setting is a health advantage and can provide a significantly more healing experience for its user. These days, Burbano shares, outpatient surgery centers have allowed individuals to experience a different form of hospital, demystifying those events and improving privacy and comfort simultaneously. There has also been an increase in wellness resorts and health tourism, where convalescence in a spa/resort environment has been proven in evidence based design to improve healing, mood and patient satisfaction. For Burbano, such shifts mean that architects and facility providers now focus on providing a new healthcare experience by reducing the amount of discriminators in care environments. The Center for Health Design has recently reported that nature and daylighting, for example, improve recovery in younger patients. “Where such features might have been ‘nice to have’ in the past, these design features now find themselves as ‘musts’ in proposal briefs,” Burbano states. However, such a shift is not free of controversy and compromise.

Where does hospitality live in healthcare?

It’s easy to see the incredible improvements technology has provided in both inpatient and outpatient settings. In some way, hospitality flows from such technological innovation, or at least finds space as a result. Various forms of technology are now at work in healthcare settings that allow more patient-centered and controlled environments. Changes in the very nature of the bed, for example, now make a hospital bed more like your bed at home. Several outpatient surgery centers have transformed their recovery rooms into bedrooms. Many of Neenan’s clinical projects in the Northwest include lobbies which resemble hotel lobbies. “We want to decrease people’s fear and anxiety around the healthcare institution by very deliberately managing sound and light,” Burbano shares. “Our next move is to suggest concierges and greeters as well, just like those that welcome you to a hotel.”

Still, there are some clinical environments that are not like a hotel, and there is increasing discussion about whether hospitality has a place, say, in an Emergency Department. Burbano believes it does, but it takes a different form. “We have to realize that there are particular standards for primarily clinical settings, like an ED or operating room. This does not mean we can’t do anything around lighting, music, furniture and smells, but we need to be cognizant of the clinical safety reasons that dictate why that space is as it is,” he explains.

However, he adds, “You need a radiology guided operating room with robots, but designers can make it better. The machine comes in ugly grey, for example, and we don’t challenge that. There’s an awareness that we are following obscure standards, but we need to question them. There may be better outcomes with less standards, as we can see with the MRI. It was purely an instrument in the beginning — loud, uncomfortable, you had to be sedated to even get into it. Now we have the open MRI which emerged out of trying to make the patient more comfortable. It was a response to the market, to the user. So the challenge to design professionals is that there is always an opportunity to improve the environment for all, and we should not accept all we are dictated without questioning what else we can do.”

So does hospitality start with the patient as center of the experience?

Burbano believes so. He says, “In the early 1900s, healthcare institutions were symbols of illness and death. Technology and medications have decreased that impression in general but the industry has been slow to improve. We like to associate hospitals with bad places, but they are where miracles happen. Incredible things happen every day in these settings, but we forget about the miracles. Transferring control to the patient can bring great rewards. Just changing the locus of control to the patient brings changes in gowns, beds, food, furniture, even decibel levels, and these changes centered on the patient also impact staff. The idea is to demystify healthcare and improve the experience for everyone.”

There is also a connection between behavior and the environment, Burbano contends. Should your clinic greeter act the same as a hotel greeter? Yes, if you want to change the patient and their family’s experience of your facility. Should your patients arrive via a different hallway than the staff? Yes, if possible. Should the hallway itself be free of medical objects and more like a hotel? Most definitely. Burbano adds, “There are very little limitations to pushing the environment, except for facility determined or clinical reasons and the specific environments and conditions that need to be met there. Plastics centers may have different needs than heart or cancer centers, so it is hard to apply universal concepts; but separating traffic, improving patient privacy and hospitality are all accomplishable in these settings.” Finally, Burbano suggests that behavioral change is just as important as design changes. “There is a distinct connection between space and the ways in which we act there. Hospitable places require hospitable behaviors, so those two things must be in alignment, for any breach of patient expectations will be more profoundly felt. A hospitable environment includes everyone. Everyone should feel welcome there. Sometimes this may conflict with our ideas on safety and this is the tension between hospitals and hospitality.”

So will hospitality become the new rule in healthcare facilities? As you can see, there is a lot of evidence to suggest it should, but our cultural and industrial senses of what should happen in these spaces are challenging. If you could design a clinic based on hospitality, how would it look, feel and smell?

With thanks to Daquella manera, Keith Williamson, MShades, and nettaphoto for their wonderful pieces of art!

Kirsti

Bookmark and Share